|
|
Koorey, R. (2007). Documentation of the surgical count. Dissector, 34(4), 23–6,28,30.
Abstract: The author examines the current practices around the surgical counts of sponges, sharps and instruments, which is an integral component of safe perioperative nursing practice. Current practice, legislative requirements are reviewed, and the guidelines from the Perioperative Nurses College of New Zealand are reproduced. Case studies of errors in counts are used to illustrate the legal standards of practice.
|
|
|
|
Pirret, A. M. (2003). A preoperative scoring system to identify patients requiring postoperative high dependency care. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 19(5), 267–275.
Abstract: The incidence of postoperative complications is reduced with early identification of at risk patients and improved postoperative monitoring. This study describes the development and effect of a nursing preoperative assessment tool to identify patients at risk of postoperative complications and to reduce the number of acute admissions to ICU/HDU. All surgical patients admitted to a surgical ward for an elective surgical procedure (n=7832) over a 23-month period were concurrently scored on admission using the preoperative assessment tool. During the time period studied, acute admissions to ICU/HDU reduced from 40.37 to 19.11%. Only 24.04% of patients who had a PAS >4 were identified by the surgeon and/or anesthetist as being at risk of a postoperative complication, or if identified, no provision was made for improved postoperative monitoring. This study supports the involvement of nurses in identifying preoperatively patients at risk of a postoperative complication and in need of improved postoperative monitoring. The postoperative monitoring requirements for the PAS >4 patients were relatively low technology interventions.
|
|
|
|
Lysaght, E. (1979). A report on health problems of theatre nurses. New Zealand Nursing Journal, 72(1), 24–26.
Abstract: This paper reports the results of a questionnaire sent to 300 theatre nurses
|
|
