Abstract: Good nutrition is essential following acute spinal cord injury. Poor nutrition can lead to the deleterious effects of protein-calorie induced hypermetabolism and poor functional and rehabilitation outcomes. Nutritional management for patients with acute cervical or high thoracic spinal cord injury admitted to the Canterbury District Health Board's Burwood Spinal Unit and Christchurch Hospital's Department of Intensive Care Medicine (CHDICM) differ. The Burwood Spinal Unit has a delayed approach to nutritional management in contrast to the implementation of early enteral feeding by CHDICM. This prompted a literature review to critically consider the evidence underpinning clinical practice in this field. Literature revealed that nutritional management in the first 72 hours after spinal cord injury is a complex process. The complexities of when to commence, the method of delivering, and the target dose of enteral nutrition in the first 72 hours after spinal cord injury are due to the perceived risk of a spinal ileus and the ensuing, such as adverse effects on abdominal and respiratory function, resulting from enteral feeding intolerance. Literature revealed that delayed nutrition is largely based on expert opinion, while early enteral feeding has limited but stronger scientific research evidence. Nevertheless, it is desirable to use the best evidence currently available to develop, implement and evaluate an evidence-based, protocol driven, clinical pathway for nutritional management of patients within 72 hours of an acute cervical or high thoracic SCI. The author concludes that to ensure an acute spinal cord injury clinical pathway is based on scientific evidence, prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials are needed to substantiate early enteral feeding and identification of the degree of and risk of complications from spinal ileus after acute cervical or high thoracic spinal cord injury.

Abstract: This research examines how nurses negotiate the context of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) while working with families. The action research described in this thesis developed through a series of meetings and conversations where the conversations supported the reflexive intent of the research. In commissioning the research, the design of the meetings and conversations were as a series of overlapping actions. Data collection and data analysis occurred in the action research by meetings, reflective conversations, ad libitum observations, and in a research journal. Conceptual maps explain the progress and findings of the research in this thesis while categories distilled from the conversations also support the findings in the research. The Family Action Research Group that was established within this project proposed a Family Assessment Form for the family to provide an assessment of themselves and the patient. Implementing this assessment tool demonstrated that clear information was needed for the family in the ICU. Findings in this research focus on developing action research and family care in ICU. Findings also focused on the role of the researcher being of and not being of the context where action research is undertaken. Recommendations include staff examining relationships for potential asymmetries and seeking ways to address these to support families and staff. Suggested strategies for developing action research in a clinical context include detailed planning, clear focusing, transparency of data, and working to explain change initiatives through the research are also included.