| |
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Garcia, Alicia; Whitehead, Dean; Winter, Helen S |
|
| |
Title |
Oncology nurses' perception of cancer pain: a qualitative exploratory study |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2015 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume  |
31 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
27-33 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Cancer pain; Oncology nurses; Pain assessment; Pain management; Nursing education |
|
| |
Abstract |
Undertakes research to explore how oncology nurses perceive cancer pain in patients. Presents the findings of semi-structured interviews with a sample of 5 registered nurses working in a NZ oncology ward, who reported their responses to under-treatment of cancer pain. Highlights the need to explore cancer pain management with patients. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1500 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Fitzgerald, S.; Tripp, H.; Halksworth-Smith, G. |
|
| |
Title |
Assessment and management of acute pain in older people: barriers and facilitators to nursing practice |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2017 |
Publication |
Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
35 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
48-57 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Pain assessment; Pain management; Aged patients; Acute care nurses |
|
| |
Abstract |
Examines the pain management practices of nurses, and identifies barriers and facilitators to the assessment and management of pain for older people, within the acute hospital setting. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1788 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Pitama, S.; Robertson, P.; Cram, F.; Gillies, M.; Huria, T.; Dalla-Katoa, W. |
|
| |
Title |
Meihana model: A clinical assessment framework |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2007 |
Publication |
New Zealand Journal of Psychology |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
36 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
118-125 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Nursing models; Clinical assessment; Maori; Mental health |
|
| |
Abstract |
In 1984 Mason Durie documented a framework for understanding Maori health, Te Whare Tapa Wha, which has subsequently become embedded in Maori health policy. This article presents a specific assessment framework, the Meihana Model, which encompasses the four original cornerstones of Te Whare Tapa Wha, and inserts two additional elements. These form a practice model (alongside Maori beliefs, values and experiences) to guide clinical assessment and intervention with Maori clients and whanau accessing mental health services. This paper outlines the rationale for and background of the Meihana Model and then describes each dimension: whanau, wairua, tinana, hinengaro, taiao and iwi katoa. The model provides a basis for a more comprehensive assessment of clients/whanau to underpin appropriate treatment decisions. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
459 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Hardy, D.J.; O'Brien, A.P.; Gaskin, C.J.; O'Brien, A.J.; Morrison-Ngatai, E.; Skews, G.; Ryan, T.; McNulty, N. |
|
| |
Title |
Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2004 |
Publication |
Journal of Advanced Nursing |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
46 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
95-109 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Clinical assessment; Biculturalism; Professional competence; Psychiatric Nursing; Maori |
|
| |
Abstract |
The aim of this paper is to detail the practical application of the Delphi technique as a culturally and clinically valid means of accessing expert opinion on the importance of clinical criteria. Reference is made to a bicultural New Zealand mental health nursing clinical indicator study that employed a three-round reactive Delphi survey. Equal proportions of Maori and non-Maori nurses (n = 20) and consumers (n = 10) rated the importance of 91 clinical indicator statements for the achievement of professional practice standards. Additional statements (n = 21) suggested by Delphi participants in round 1 were included in subsequent rounds. In round 2, participants explained the rating they applied to statements that had not reached consensus in round 1, and summarised responses were provided to participants in round 3. Consensus was considered to have been achieved if 85% of round 3 ratings lay within a 2-point bracket on the 5-point Likert-scale overall, or in one of the Maori nurse, non-Maori nurse, or consumer groups. A mean rating of 4.5 after round 3 was set as the importance threshold. Consensus occurred overall on 75 statements, and within groups on another 24. Most statements (n = 86) reached the importance benchmark. The authors conclude that when rigorous methods of participant selection, group composition, participant feedback, and determination of consensus and importance are employed, the Delphi technique is a reliable, cost-effective means of obtaining and prioritising experts' judgements. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1060 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Lesa, R.; Dixon, D.A. |
|
| |
Title |
Physical assessment: Implications for nurse educators and nursing practice |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2007 |
Publication |
International Nursing Review |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
54 |
Issue |
2 |
Pages |
166-172 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Advanced nursing practice; Clinical assessment; Cardiovascular diseases; Nursing; Education |
|
| |
Abstract |
In New Zealand, the physical assessment of a patient has traditionally been the domain of the medical profession. Recent implementation of advanced practice roles has expanded the scope of practice and nurse practitioners may now be expected to perform physical assessments. The aim of this literature review was to discover what could be learnt from the experiences of Western countries. Nurses from the USA, Canada and Australia readily incorporate physical assessment skills into their nursing practice as a component of health assessment. The international literature identified that any change to the nurse's role in health assessment, to include physical assessment skills, requires strategies that involve the regulatory, educational and practice components of nursing. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
786 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Ardagh, M.; Wells, E.; Cooper, K.; Lyons, R.; Patterson, R.; O'Donovan, P. |
|
| |
Title |
Effect of a rapid assessment clinic on the waiting time to be seen by a doctor and the time spent in the department, for patients presenting to an urban emergency department: A controlled prospective trial |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2002 |
Publication |
New Zealand Medical Journal |
Abbreviated Journal |
Access is free to articles older than 6 months, and abstracts. |
|
| |
Volume |
115 |
Issue |
1157 |
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
Emergency nursing; Time factors; Clinical assessment; Clinical decision making |
|
| |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that triaging certain emergency department patients through a rapid assessment clinic (RAC) improves the waiting times, and times in the department, for all patients presenting to the emergency department. For ten weeks an additional nurse and doctor were rostered. On the odd weeks, these two staff ran a RAC and on even weeks, they did not, but simply joined the other medical and nursing staff, managing patients in the traditional way. During the five weeks of the RAC clinic a total of 2263 patients attended the emergency department, and 361 of these were referred to the RAC clinic. During the five control weeks a total of 2204 patients attended the emergency department. There was no significant difference in the distribution across triage categories between the RAC and non-RAC periods. The researchers found that the rapid management of patients with problems which do not require prolonged assessment or decision making, is beneficial not only to those patients, but also to other patients sharing the same, limited resources. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
617 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Fraser, A.G.; Williamson, S.; Lane, M.; Hollis, B. |
|
| |
Title |
Nurse-led dyspepsia clinic using the urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2003 |
Publication |
New Zealand Medical Journal |
Abbreviated Journal |
Access is free to articles older than 6 months, and abstracts. |
|
| |
Volume |
116 |
Issue |
1176 |
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
Advanced nursing practice; Hospitals; Clinical assessment; Evaluation |
|
| |
Abstract |
Reports the audit of a nurse-led dyspepsia clinic at Auckland Hospital. Referrals to the Gastroenterology Department for gastroscopy were assessed in a dyspepsia clinic. Initial evaluation included consultation and a urea breath test (UBT). Patients given eradication treatment prior to initial clinic assessment were excluded. Patients with a positive UBT were given eradication treatment and were reviewed two months later for symptom assessment and follow-up UBT. Patients with a negative UBT were usually referred back to the GP. There were 173 patients with a mean age 38 years. The urea breath test was found to be useful as part of the initial assessment of selected patients who would otherwise have been referred for endoscopy. It is likely that the need for gastroscopy was reduced, but longer follow up will be required to determine whether or not this effect is simply due to delayed referral. This approach is likely to have value only in patients who have a relatively high chance of being H. pylori positive. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 625 |
Serial |
611 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Richardson, S.; Ardagh, M.; Hider, P. |
|
| |
Title |
New Zealand health professionals do not agree about what defines appropriate attendance at an emergency department |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2006 |
Publication |
New Zealand Medical Journal |
Abbreviated Journal |
Access is free to articles older than 6 months, and abstracts. |
|
| |
Volume |
119 |
Issue |
1232 |
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
Hospitals; Clinical assessment; Interprofessional relations |
|
| |
Abstract |
This study aims to examine the concept of 'inappropriate' emergency department attendances in relation to the emergency department at Christchurch Hospital. It specifically seeks to determine whether there is a consensus opinion among healthcare providers regarding a definition of 'inappropriate'. An exploratory survey of health professionals involved with the referral, assessment, transport, and treatment of emergency department patients in Christchurch was carried out. A range of health professionals, including ambulance personnel, general practitioners, emergency department physicians, emergency nurses, and hospital managers were approached. A series of questions relating to definition and response to 'inappropriate' patients was asked, with an additional open-ended question relating to the definition of 'appropriateness'. The researchers found significant differences in the attitudes and perceptions of key health professionals involved in the referral, treatment, and admission of patients to the emergency department. This has implications for any interventions aimed at addressing emergency department 'overcrowding' that assume the presence of a consensus understanding of this concept. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
526 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
