| |
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Börner, Heidi.E |
|
| |
Title |
Evaluating safe patient handling systems: Is there a better way? |
Type |
|
| |
Year |
2008 |
Publication |
|
Abbreviated Journal |
ResearchArchive@Victoria |
|
| |
Volume |
|
Issue |
|
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
Patient safety; Evaluation research; Occupational health and safety |
|
| |
Abstract |
This observational study analyses the responses of 38 nurses from two similar units that use different patient handling systems to test the reliability and validity of the Safe Patient Handling Survey (TM) SPH Survey(TM), a perception survey and improvement tool for employees and employers. Currently there is a lack of tools for evaluating patient handling systems. The survey contains 55 questions divided into 6 clusters, staff and patient injury and violence questions, and picture questions depicting unsafe techniques. The data were analysed to see how the SPH Survey(TM) scores correlate with incidents, and its ability to detect differences between the two units. The results of the Pearson and Cronbach(TM) alpha tests show strong reliability, validity and consistency of the SPH Survey(TM). ANOVA comparison of means and Spearman(TM) rho tests shows that higher (better) scores on the SPH Survey(TM) clusters correlate with lower numbers of patient injuries, lower reports of verbal and physical violence episodes, and lower staff injuries. Differences were detected between the units with Unit 2 scoring higher than Unit 1 in all SPH Survey(TM) clusters and scoring lower in staff and patient injuries and violence incidents. Although the analysis was limited by the small sample size, the study has created a sound basis for further investigation. The SPH Survey(TM) is shown to be an easy way to reliably evaluate patient handling systems and workplace culture, target improvement initiatives, and continually monitor the level of patient handling risk in the workplace. Low-risk patient handling gives health care providers the means to focus on delivering high quality patient care, without endangering their own health and well-being. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial  |
1224 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Peach, J. |
|
| |
Title |
The Professional Development Programme: Achievements and outcomes |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
1999 |
Publication |
Professional Leader |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
5 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
6-9 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Professional development; Evaluation; Nursing |
|
| |
Abstract |
This article backgrounds the professional development programme instigated at Auckland Hospital in 1988, and reviews the achievements of the past 10 years. It describes PDP and distinguishes it from a clinical career pathway. Specific indicators were used to assess the achievement of the programme, and these are presented. Overall the programme achieved it's outcomes and at a reasonable cost. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 1289 |
Serial |
1274 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Litchfield, M. |
|
| |
Title |
Between the idea and reality |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
1986 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
1 |
Issue |
2 |
Pages |
17-29 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Nursing research; Nursing philosophy; Diagnosis; Evaluation |
|
| |
Abstract |
A paper presented as one of the four “Winter Lecture Series” hosted by the Nursing Studies unit of the Department of Education, Victoria University of Wellington. It is a critique of “ The Nursing Process” referred to commonly in nursing education programmes. It challenges the usefulness for nursing of the linear sequence of steps of assessment, diagnosis, planning, intervention and evaluation. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1313 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Robertson, Heather R; Neville, Stephen |
|
| |
Title |
Health promotion impact evaluation : 'healthy messages calendar (Te maramataka korero hauora)' |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
24 |
Issue |
1 (Mar) |
Pages |
p.24-35 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Health promotion; Inequalities; Impact evaluation; Maori health |
|
| |
Abstract |
Evaluates the project to determine if it was an effective health promotion tool for the dissemination of health information. Obtains qualitative data from 5 focus groups and analyses data using a general inductive approach. Concludes that there are positive links between health promotion practices and the health needs of a local community. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1430 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Haggerty, Carmel; Holloway, Kathryn; Wilson, Debra |
|
| |
Title |
Entry to nursing practice preceptor education and support : could we do better? |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2012 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
28 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
30-39 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Preceptorship; New graduates; Evaluation; Support and education |
|
| |
Abstract |
Reveals that recent longitudinal evaluation of 21 Nursing Entry to Practice (NETP) programmes in NZ identified that preceptorship selection, education and support are not properly resourced. Identifies the factors preventing preceptors from receiving appropriate training and recommends development of a clearly-defined preceptor selection and education process. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1472 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Hedley, Cath and others |
|
| |
Title |
The B4 school check behaviour measures : findings from the Hawke's Bay evaluation |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2012 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
28 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
13-23 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Before (B4) School Checks; Child behaviour; Nurse evaluation; Parenting support |
|
| |
Abstract |
Evaluates the B4 School Checks in Hawke's Bay, focusing on children assessed as having behaviour issues, as determined by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Reviews Health Hawke's Bay (HHB) records for the number and demographics of the children assessed, and the interventions recommended. Interviews 36 parents to discover what difference the B4 check made to children's behaviour and which aspects of the check contributed to successful outcomes. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1477 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Cameron, Megan |
|
| |
Title |
Evaluation report of a postgraduate specialty programme: is a specialty nursing qualification delivering what it says it does? |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2017 |
Publication |
Whitireia Nursing and Health Journal |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
|
Issue |
24 |
Pages |
37-45 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Evaluation; Primary health care; Nursing; Well Child/Tamariki Ora; Postgraduate study; Surveys |
|
| |
Abstract |
Examines whether a postgraduate programme for Well Child/Tamariki Ora (WCTO) nurses prepares nurses new to child health to understand primary health care, health promotion, community nursing and nursing theory. Uses on online survey devised by Plunket National Educators to evaluate the (WCTO) strand of the Postgraduate Certificate in Primary Health Care Specialty Nursing curriculum against the delivery of the programme. Assesses student experience and student perceptions of the impact of their learning on their nursing practice. Considers whether it enables nurses to consider the specific populations in their care, or to encourage individuals, families and communities to increase their skills in health-focused daily living. Seeks to ascertain whether the structure of the programme, based on the clinical integration approach, supports nursing practice and academic study. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1549 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Wynne-Jones, Jacqui; Martin-Babin, Margot; Hayward, Brooke; Villa, Luis |
|
| |
Title |
Patient safety leadership walk-rounds: lessons learrned from a mixed-methods evaluaion |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2020 |
Publication |
Kai Tiaki Nursing Research |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
11 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
24-33 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Patient safety; Nurse leaders; Walk-round; Evaluation |
|
| |
Abstract |
Assesses the impact of a patient safety leadership walk-rounds (PSLWR) programme in an Auckland hospital to provide recommendations for programme improvement. Involves senior leaders and other departmental representatives visiting wards to conduct staff and patient interviews to capture their experiences, and to assess the environment. Proposes recommendations for organisations intending to or currently implementing a PSLWR programme. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1658 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
